Identity verification · applicant and corporate shareholder
CUSTOMER ACustomer A: Apex Interactive Ltd is the applicant.
Customer B: Meridian Holdings Ltd owns 40% of Customer A in this illustrative scenario.
| Invocation | Entity | Invoked by |
|---|---|---|
| ID-A-001 | Customer A · Apex Interactive Ltd | Client Risk Management |
| ID-B-001 | Customer B · Meridian Holdings Ltd | Identity ID-A-001 |
Same onboarding request APL-00842. Customer B’s separate parallel run starts here because B owns 40% of A. Its full sanctions and downstream flow is outside this demo; the later identity return is illustrative.
PEP match · context investigation
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE REQUIREDThe names are similar, but the age and location do not match. A name-only alert is insufficient to identify the director as a PEP.
| Attribute | Applicant director | PEP database record | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | David Collins | David J. Collins | Similar name |
| Age | 42 years | 67 years | Does not match |
| Residence | Manchester, UK | Ottawa, Canada | Does not match |
Illustrative evidence for this simulation. Age, residence, nationality and employment history are considered together.
Compliance review required · Michael Petrov
WORKFLOW PAUSEDIs this sanctions alert a false positive or an actual match? Review the evidence and record your decision to release or hold onboarding.
| Evidence | Finding |
|---|---|
| Name / nationality | Align with the screening record |
| Birth / residence records | Conflicting details; identity remains inconclusive |
| Supporting package | Ownership documents, screening results and identity records assembled |
Policy: unresolved sanctions ambiguity requires an authorized human decision. No automated approval is permitted.
Interactive simulation: your selection is recorded in the execution log for final independent review.
Independent Decision Assurance Review
All operational agents have completed their work and all required approvals are recorded. The independent agent now reviews the full execution record.
Original intent — Safely onboard the customer while ensuring regulatory compliance.
Two false positives: PEP and sanctions (one human review, counted within the sanctions resolution). Four straightforward approvals: application validation, the combined identity outcome for A and B, risk aggregation and onboarding. Two identity invocations belong to one identity assessment stream. One separate industry correction. All outcomes and metrics are simulated.
TRUSTED AGENTIC
ONBOARDING
AUTHORITY VERIFIED · CONTEXT ENRICHED
DECISIONS ASSURED · COMPLIANCE MAINTAINED
A completed onboarding workflow, independently reviewed.